# Mobile vs Residential Proxies: What the Extra Cost Buys | ProxyJam

Mobile and residential proxies both carry an ISP's registration. A mobile address is shared by many subscribers at once, which is why it is priced far higher.

- Canonical: https://proxyjam.com/blog/mobile-vs-residential-proxies/
- Updated: 2026-09-21
- Language: en

The difference between mobile and residential proxies is carrier-grade NAT: a phone carrier puts many subscribers behind one public address, so refusing that address refuses all of them, which is why sellers price mobile higher. That reluctance is no licence to outlast a block. Pay for mobile when the job needs a carrier network, and choose a residential address for most other work.


## For deciding whether a job justifies carrier prices

### Buyers weighing carrier prices

The carrier plumbing behind the difference, and what it costs you.

### Anyone matching a type to a job

Where each type wins, mobile or residential.


## Before paying for a mobile address

1. The job needs a carrier network, such as checking how your own campaign is served to that carrier's subscribers.
2. The work is your own, or you are authorised to do it.
3. Nothing in it has to survive the carrier changing the address.
4. The budget covers a plan priced by traffic allowance and period. If any of these fails, a residential address is the better buy.

## Mobile or residential, job by job

|  | Mobile | Residential |
|---|---|---|
| What a lookup returns | A phone network | A fixed-line internet provider |
| Who a target refuses along with you | Every subscriber sharing the address with you | Usually one household or one customer |
| Checking how your own campaign shows on a carrier network | Wins: the ad has to be served over that network | Impossible: the network is wrong |
| Testing how an app behaves on cellular | Wins: a real carrier route is the faithful test | Loses: a wired line cannot stand in for one |
| Holding one session for hours | Loses: a reconnect can bring back a different address | Wins if static; a rotating pool fails |
| Being recognised as the same visitor next month | Fails: nothing about the address is yours to keep | Wins: a static address stays yours |
| Throughput and consistency | Loses: a cellular route can vary by the hour | Wins if static: server hardware on a data-centre link |
| Cost for the same month of work | Loses: in our catalogue, the smallest monthly plan costs many times a month of one static address | Wins: a static address is priced per IP per month |
| What you buy | A plan: a traffic allowance for a set period | Static: one address for a period. Rotating: traffic by the gigabyte |

Read down the left column until you find your work. The verdicts are reasoned from how carriers share addresses and how each type is sold, and the cost row is read from the catalogue snapshot this site is built from. We have made no speed or block-rate measurements, and a target that treats carrier ranges unusually can change any row.


## Quick answers

### Why do sites hesitate to block a mobile address?

A carrier has far fewer public addresses than subscribers, so it puts many phones behind one of them at a time. Refusing that address turns away everyone parked behind it, including paying customers doing nothing unusual, so a target that knows this may hesitate. That is why mobile costs more. It is no way around a block: getting past a site's rules is prohibited under section 5 of our Acceptable Use Policy.

### Is the mobile proxy premium worth paying?

Only when the job needs the phone network specifically, such as how your own campaign is served on a carrier or an app's cellular path. For other work, an address registered to an internet provider already answers what a registration lookup checks for.

### Can a mobile proxy hold a long session?

Not reliably. After a reconnect a phone can come back on a different shared address, and that choice belongs to the carrier. Work that must be recognised as the same visitor an hour later is fighting the network's own design, and the network wins.

### Is residential the same as rotating?

No, and the word covers both. A residential address can be static, held for the period you paid for, or it can come from a rotating pool that hands you a different one per request. For most jobs, that split is the first decision to make.

### Does ProxyJam sell mobile proxies?

Not yet. Mobile appears in our configurator because the catalogue carries it in 15 countries, and the card says coming soon and means it.

### Mobile or residential: which should I buy for accounts I run?

In most cases, the static kind of residential address. Running accounts you own or are authorised to operate needs an address that holds still and is registered to an internet provider. That is a static ISP address, without a carrier plan's price or its address changes.


## Sources

- [RFC 6269: Issues with IP Address Sharing](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6269), IANA completing its IPv4 allocations on 3 February 2011, and address sharing defeating penalty-box abuse handling
- [RFC 6888: Common Requirements for Carrier-Grade NATs (CGNs)](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6888), a public address shared by many subscribers, and paired address pooling as the default
- [RFC 6598: IANA-Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6598), the 100.64.0.0/10 block for numbering links between carrier NATs and subscriber equipment
- [RFC 7021: Assessing the Impact of Carrier-Grade NAT on Network Applications](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7021), an independent submission to the RFC series reporting anti-abuse limits that misread address sharing as too many connections from one device
- [RFC 6302: Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6302), why a shared public address alone no longer identifies a customer




A mobile proxy and a residential proxy both carry an internet provider's
registration. What separates them is how many people share the address, and
that decides what a mobile address costs and which jobs justify it.

## Why do carriers share one address among many subscribers?

There are far more subscribers than public IPv4 addresses. IANA completed its
allocations of IPv4 space on 3 February 2011, as
[RFC 6269](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6269) records, so a carrier parks
many subscribers behind one address at a time and translates between them at the
edge of its network.

The device that does this is a **carrier-grade NAT**.
[RFC 6888](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6888) sets the requirements for
one, describing a public address "shared by many subscribers", and
[RFC 6598](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6598) reserves a block,
100.64.0.0/10, for numbering the links between those devices and subscriber
equipment. Carriers built all of this for their own subscribers, and mobile
proxies inherit it.

## What does sharing an address change for a target?

Refusing a shared mobile address turns away every subscriber the carrier has
placed behind it at that moment, and most of them are doing nothing unusual.
RFC 6269 spells out the side effect in its section on abuse logging: one user who
fails a number of logins may block out others sharing the address, and under
widespread address sharing "penalty box solutions to service abuse simply will
not work".

An independent assessment of carrier-grade NAT, published in the RFC series as
[RFC 7021](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7021), reports that anti-abuse
limits on connections per address can misread sharing as too many connections
from a single device. [RFC 6302](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6302) asks
servers to log the source port and a timestamp accurate to the second alongside
the address, because a shared public address alone no longer identifies a
customer.

A target that cares about the subscribers sharing that address has a reason to
hesitate before refusing it, and sellers price that reluctance in. That
reluctance is no licence to outlast a block or a rate limit: section 5 of our
[Acceptable Use Policy](/acceptable-use-policy/) prohibits getting past a site's
rules on any network.

A residential address gives a target less reason to hesitate. A static ISP
address is held by one customer by definition, and a home broadband line may or
may not sit behind its provider's NAT. The fewer people behind an address, the
less a target loses by refusing it.

## What does a shared carrier address cost you?

You pay for the sharing in stability, consistent speed and price.

- **Stability.** The address is not yours. A carrier NAT keeps one external
  address for all of a subscriber's sessions while they last, the paired pooling
  that RFC 6888 makes the default. Nothing reserves the address afterwards, and a
  reconnect can bring the phone back on a different one. Work that depends on
  being the same visitor twice has nothing to hold on to.
- **Speed and consistency.** A cellular route can vary with the tower, the hour
  and the load more than a wired line does, and for work measured in throughput
  that variation costs you.
- **Price.** Mobile is sold by plan: a traffic allowance for a set period, at a
  price per plan. In the catalogue snapshot this site is built from, the least
  expensive monthly mobile plan costs many times a month of one static address.
  The static rate is on the [pricing page](/pricing/), and mobile is not on sale
  from us yet.

## Where does a mobile proxy win, and where does residential?

Mobile wins where the phone network is the point and the thing being checked is
yours:

- how your own ads, offers or app pages are served to a particular carrier's
  subscribers;
- how an app you build or test behaves on a cellular path compared with a wired
  one;
- a site of your own, or one you are authorised to test, that treats carrier
  ranges differently from broadband ones.

In those jobs there is no substitute, and the premium belongs in the job's
budget. Getting past a site's access rules, including rules that keep something
for a carrier's own subscribers, is prohibited under section 5 of our
[Acceptable Use Policy](/acceptable-use-policy/), whichever network the address
is on.

For everything else, the only question for your own work is whether an address
is registered to an internet provider, and a residential address already
answers it. Carrier prices on top add nothing to that answer.

## How does residential split into static and rotating?

Residential covers two products. A rotating pool gives breadth and no
continuity. A static ISP address gives an internet provider's registration that
stays yours for the period you paid for, on server hardware, at a fixed price
per address.

For work on accounts you own or are authorised to run, long sessions,
allow-listed access and anything that must be the same visitor next week, the
static address beats a carrier address and a rotating pool alike. ProxyJam sells
only that one of the three, so treat the verdict as a seller's and test it
against your own job. The full comparison of the two residential kinds is in
[ISP against rotating residential](/blog/isp-vs-residential-proxies/).

## Is the mobile premium worth paying?

It pays off on a short list: your own campaigns on a carrier, cellular app
tests, and sites of your own that treat carrier ranges differently. Account work
and long sessions sit better on a static address, which carries the registration
a lookup checks for and stays yours for the period.

The [definition of an ISP proxy](/blog/what-are-isp-proxies/) explains that
address, [residential against datacenter](/blog/residential-vs-datacenter-proxies/)
covers the registration check, and the [ISP proxies page](/isp-proxies/) has the
catalogue for 74 countries. The carrier product is described on the
[mobile proxies page](/mobile-proxies/) and is not yet on sale.

