English
A platform that has seen an account sign in from one network for months can read a sudden change of network as a sign the account has been taken over. A static ISP address removes that one signal — it is the same IP, registered to a named internet provider, on every session, for as long as you hold it.
This scenario has a condition attached, and it is on this page rather than buried in a policy: accounts you do not personally own need evidence of your authority over them before we open access.
In short: For accounts you own or are authorised to operate, give each account that matters one static address and change nothing afterwards. A platform that has watched an account sign in from one network for months can read a new network as a risk signal.
Account management here means operating accounts you own, or accounts you are contracted to run, from an address that does not change between sessions. A static ISP address is a single IP whose registration belongs to a named internet provider, reserved to you until your paid period ends. A rotating pool does the opposite: each request, or each short sticky window, leaves from a new address, which is exactly the change this job is trying to avoid.
Sign-in checks do read the network, and some platforms document how. Microsoft’s Entra ID Protection lists risk detections for sign-ins with properties unfamiliar to the user’s history, for sign-ins from geographically distant locations, and for sign-ins from anonymous IP addresses such as Tor or anonymous VPNs. Most platforms publish less, but the address is one of the few signals every sign-in carries. Where access is bound to an address, the binding is explicit: Google Cloud lets you restrict an API key to specific IP addresses, and a key restricted that way is refused from anywhere else. The page rests on documentation like this and on the way static and rotating addresses differ, not on measurements of any platform; the terms it quotes come from our Terms of Service, Refund Policy and Acceptable Use Policy.
Most account problems attributed to proxies are really problems of sharing — one address doing several jobs, or several accounts sharing one address.
Buy one address per account that matters. Reputation attaches to an IP, not to your organisation. Two accounts behind one address are visibly linked, and one of them getting into trouble is now both of them getting into trouble.
Pick a carrier that fits the account’s story. The catalogue names the provider behind every block, 22 of them in the United States. An account that has always signed in through one network in one market should not suddenly arrive through a different one.
Change nothing afterwards. The value is continuity. Every rotation, every shared session and every borrowed login from a different network is a fresh signal, and the whole point of paying per address rather than per gigabyte is that there are none.
Company profiles, seller accounts, advertiser accounts and developer consoles that belong to you. Nothing needs verifying — the address simply stops the platform seeing your team as a moving target. If an account belongs to an employer or a client instead, the next card applies.
Agencies and managed-service teams operating a client's presence. This is the case our policy asks about: we open it once you can show authority over the accounts, which for an agency is often the contract it already has.
A distributed team signing into one account from four continents produces the same pattern a takeover does: sign-ins from distant places in quick succession. A fixed address the whole team routes through turns four locations back into one.
Where an integration or an API key is bound to a specific IP, that address has to be yours and has to stay yours. A rotating pool cannot make that promise, because the next request leaves from a different address.
Scheduled posting, reporting pulls and inbox handling against accounts you control, within the platform's own rules for automation. The work is unremarkable; what makes it fail is arriving from a different network each time it runs.
The account is yours, or you can show written authority to operate it.The platform’s own terms allow the way you plan to use it, automation included.It has an address of its own, not shared with another account.The address is in the country the account has normally signed in from.Everyone who signs in to the account goes through that address.Auto-renew is on or renewal is in the calendar, because renewing is what keeps the same address.
Address stability
Network registration
Rotation
Session length
Access control
ConcurrencyOne of the answers below states a condition on this scenario rather than a term of sale. It is here because a condition a buyer only discovers after paying is a condition we hid.
For accounts you personally own, yes, with no condition. For accounts on third-party platforms that you do not personally own — a client's, an employer's, anyone's but yours — section 2 of our acceptable use policy says “we ask for evidence of your authority over those accounts” before access is opened. That is a one-off written confirmation, not an approval queue, and for an agency it is often the contract that already exists. Section 5 prohibits “creating, verifying, aging, farming, automating, selling, renting, or transferring accounts” on third-party platforms without authorisation, and identity masking for “ban avoidance”; no verification changes that. Either way, the platform's own rules still apply to you (section 3). Acceptable Use Policy
One, if the accounts matter. Reputation attaches to the address, so two accounts behind one IP are visibly connected and share each other's history, good and bad. One address behind ten accounts is a single point of failure for all ten.
Because rotation is the signal you are trying to remove. A pool hands you a different address per request or per short window, and a session that changes network partway through is precisely the pattern platforms treat as a compromised account. Rotation is the right tool for going wide across many targets; this job is the opposite shape. ISP vs residential
No, and anyone promising that is selling you something they cannot deliver. The address is one signal among many — the others are the browser and device fingerprint, the timing and volume of what you do, and the account's own history. A stable address registered to an internet provider removes one common reason to look twice. It does not make anything else you do invisible.
Yes. Renewing keeps the same address rather than issuing a new one, which for this scenario is the whole product: an account that has signed in from one IP for six months should still be signing in from it in month seven.
We replace it free, up to 20 % of your order per calendar month, and a block on a target you told us about is explicit grounds. On the first order you also have 72 hours to ask for the money back, covering up to 10 IPs, and testing the proxies against your real targets does not void it — which is the only kind of guarantee worth having for this job. Refund Policy
